| 25 October 2024 |
FBI and US government partners |
Public statementNamed in the FBI notice of 24 April 2025 as an earlier public statement on Salt Typhoon activity; the statement itself was not opened.[5] |
| 13 November 2024 |
FBI and CISA |
Joint statementSaid PRC-affiliated actors compromised multiple telecommunications companies and stole call records data.[4] |
| 3 December 2024 |
CISA, NSA, FBI, ACSC, Canadian Cyber Centre, NCSC-NZ |
GuidanceEnhanced Visibility and Hardening Guidance for Communications Infrastructure (the page shows 4 December 2024).[5, 6] |
| 5 December 2024 |
US Federal Communications Commission |
Proposed rulesChair proposed a Declaratory Ruling and rulemaking to require telecom carriers to secure their networks.[22] |
| 15 January 2025 |
US Federal Communications Commission |
Declaratory Ruling (FCC 25-9)Concluded that section 105 of the CALEA law requires carriers to secure their networks; adopted 15 January and released 16 January 2025.[23] |
| 17 January 2025 |
US Department of the Treasury (OFAC) |
SanctionDesignated Sichuan Juxinhe Network Technology Co., LTD. for direct involvement in the Salt Typhoon intrusions.[3] |
| 17 January 2025 |
US Department of State (Rewards for Justice), as cited by Treasury |
Reward offerReward of up to 10 million US dollars for information on persons acting for a foreign government who attack US critical infrastructure; a general offer, not named for Salt Typhoon.[3] |
| 15 April 2025 |
Canadian Centre for Cyber Security |
AdvisoryEdge router advisory covering activity associated with Salt Typhoon.[10] |
| 24 April 2025 |
FBI |
Public notice seeking tipsAsked for information on PRC-affiliated activity tracked as Salt Typhoon, and repeated the reward offer.[5] |
| 19 June 2025 |
Canadian Centre for Cyber Security with FBI |
Threat bulletinReported Salt Typhoon compromises of Canadian telecom devices in mid-February 2025.[9] |
| 27 August 2025 |
CISA, NSA, FBI, DC3 and agencies of 12 other countries |
Joint advisory AA25-239ADescribed the techniques, exploited flaws and mitigations, and linked the operations to three China-based companies.[7, 8] |
| 27 August 2025 |
NCSC-UK |
Public attribution to companiesLinked three China-based technology companies to the campaign.[11] |
| 27 August 2025 |
Czech NÚKIB, German BfV, BND and BSI, Japan NPA and National Cybersecurity Office, NCSC-NZ |
Co-sealed AA25-239AEach agency published or joined the advisory.[12, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20] |
| 27 August 2025 |
Italian AISE and AISI, Spanish CNI, Finnish SUPO, Polish SKW and AW |
Co-sealed AA25-239AListed as co-sealing agencies in the advisory; no separate national page was opened.[7] |
| 28 August 2025 |
Australian Signals Directorate (ACSC) |
Published AA25-239APublished the advisory on cyber.gov.au.[13] |
| 28 August 2025 |
Dutch services MIVD and AIVD |
Public statementSaid they can confirm part of the US findings with their own intelligence.[16] |
| 20 November 2025 |
US Federal Communications Commission |
Order on Reconsideration (FCC 25-81)Rescinded the January 2025 Declaratory Ruling and withdrew the accompanying proposed rules.[24, 25] |